
Sentinel Eeex
Caldari DarkStar 1 GoonSwarm
|
Posted - 2008.07.25 23:23:00 -
[1]
Originally by: XxAngelxX I think we all know which group of the groups of people who are for and against this change are the ones with strategies, tactics and experience in PVP. Old school players who think this will put eve back the way it was, you are the ones not adapting, using tactics and strategies. You will continue to be dissapointed. Part time PVPers - the ones who gang up, warp to a gate, get picked off by nanos and post in eve general - you will be happy until a new strategy that works against your massive T1 blobs with capital support and titans and jump bridge capabilities, then you will start whining again.
CCP Dionwhatever (sorry I don't care what you said enough to read your name) thanks for the headsup that our knee jerk reaction, while making more sense than your dear co-workers dev blog in several points which were addressed already in this thread, is going to be taken with a pinch of salt.
Our knee jerk reaction is no where near in comparison to your 5 hour knee jerk blanket changes. The nano tactic evolved due to other changes your esteemed colleagues made to the game (capital ships, cyno jammers etc), different strategies developed from it and many, many hours of PVP went into becoming good at it. If the whiners spent the same amount of time PVPing then they'd be killing nano'd ships.
Blanket changes sending waves through the entire PVP / 0.0 / Lowsec area of the game is not what is needed to combat people who spend a lot of isk on their speed ships. Bring poly stats down to be inline with T2 Nanos, decrease drops on faction microwarp drives and speed mods in the loot tables, and you have a fix.
Pretty much the most ******ed post in the whole thread.
Tell me - did Burn Eden need nano ships in order to be successful in small gang warfare? Were they able to fight (and win) outnumbered?
I find it amusing that nano***s think their nanoships were "tactics". It was just the easiest (and least risky) way to achieve a goal - lose as little as possible. No ****ing "tactics" or "strategy".
And now you're crying. It probably means that CCP did the right thing.
We'll see...
|